Subject	Thought so. Most standard applications are something like
Posted by	Milo (Sport Z Magazine) on May 25, 2005 at 12:23 PM
	This message has been viewed 26 times.
In Reply To	the bigger the second number, the taller the sidewall (n/m) posted by SactoTodd on May 25, 2005 at 12:15 PM
Message	30 in the rear and 35 in the front.....or 40 in the rear and 45 in the front. Is this due to engine weight take into account or is there and adverse reason for doing this. Anyone? Either way my question, for the most part, has been answered. Thanks guys. Z32 body kit gallery- La-Z-Link Widebody Z32 gallery-La-Z-Link Z31 gallery- La-Z-Link
Follow Ups	Tire question about aspec ratio differences from front-back. - Milo (Sport Z Magazine) 11:02:15 05/25/05 yeah, that's clear. :/ - SactoTodd 11:32:41 05/25/05 *sigh* - Milo (Sport Z Magazine) 11:48:25 05/25/05 go here - maglito 12:12:33 05/25/05 The second number is the sidewall height represented - Dave N 12:14:01 05/25/05 the bigger the second number, the taller the sidewall (n/m) - SactoTodd 12:15:48 05/25/05 Thought so. Most standard applications are something like - Milo (Sport Z Magazine) 12:23:12 05/25/05 It's an attempt to keep tire diameter the same. - Rodger 12:31:36 05/25/05 ahhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! - College Boy 14:23:26 05/25/05 You need to read up abit more about tires - maglito 12:26:45 05/25/05 I have his old rims with his old tires still on them. I have - Milo (Sport Z Magazine) 12:42:51 05/25/05 No problem, good luck man! (n/m) - maglito 13:04:51 05/25/05 I have 235 in front and 285 in rear... - PennStateZ 15:47:43 05/25/05 do the math and calc the exact sidewall height of each - shawnc 13:44:40 05/25/05 yay for Milo... - College Boy 14:16:38 05/25/05
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.